Perez v. Mortgage Bankers

Avatar of Tim Coffield.
Avatar of Tim Coffield.

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers

Attorney
Charlottesville, VA, USA
In Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, 575 U.S. 92, 135 S. Ct. 1199 (2015), the Supreme Court held that an agency, like the Department of Labor, is not required to use notice-and-comment procedures when it wishes to issue a new interpretation of a regulation that deviates significantly from one the agency has previously adopted.
Avatar of the user.
Please login to comment.

Published: Jan 14th 2022
53
3
0

Rights
Labor
Law

Share